Skip to main content

The Illusion of Advertising (on Facebook, on Google, on Twitter, on Everything)

They say half of your marketing money is wasted, you just don't know which half. Well, unless you do. Today the companies that sell advertising on the Internet - Facebook, Google, Twitter, LinkedIn - all have huge megaphones advocating advertising. Have you ever noticed how many times you see ads for AdWords? Like not just on YouTube, but EVERWHERE? Think about that for a moment:

Ads for advertising. How weird is that?

Facebook Advertising Fraud


Illusion of Advertising on Facebook
Then along comes the latest video (here) proclaiming that - surprise - Facebook advertising is expensive, and riddled with possible fraud.  Well, yes and no. Here's the non-surprise surprise: ALL forms of advertising are riddled with problems, and on the Internet fraud whether it's click fraud or like fraud has been around forever.

Don't be naive, Scarlett. It's not just Yankees in Atlanta, it's that all forms of advertising are ridiculously expensive.

As marketers, perhaps it's a good time to step back and compare "free" vs. "paid" in terms of marketing:

  • Free advertising - as in SEO or Social Media Marketing Efforts. The pro: well it's free. And the other pro: well, people often "believe" it more than the paid (people tend to skip ads). The con: it takes constant effort, and hard work (systematically). The big pro: generally speaking in terms of the ROI, dollar for dollar it generally blows the socks off of paid advertising.
  • Paid advertising - as in AdWords or Facebook advertising. The pro: well, it's easy. In just a few minutes you can get your message up and out. The con: people ignore them, there's quite a bit of fraud (more than you'd realize).
Perhaps advertising is fool's gold. Perhaps it's the crack cocaine of marketing. Seems easy but in reality the high fritters away quickly. Perhaps we should spend 80% of our efforts on the free stuff, and only 20% on the paid stuff.

80/20 on Free Stuff vs. Paid Stuff


Question to self: are we really systematically working on the free stuff? Or are we taking at "face value" the propaganda that Google and Facebook spout at us about the wonders of advertising.

Who has the megaphone?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Quality Issues on Social Media Marketing Workbook?

Grrrrrrrrrr.  Amazon is reporting "quality issues" on my Social Media Marketing workbook . But, oops - there are NONE.  I've called in to complain and get them to remove that annoying "warning" but so far, nothing. Oh readers.  Those fun folks who have trouble with their Kindle and blame it on us poor and struggling authors. #OHWELL.  Always, contact me if you have issues with the books. I'll move heaven, earth, and Amazon to fix it.

Google Penguin, Meet Panda: A Quick Negative SEO Primer

What is negative SEO? I am getting this question more and more. So here's a quick primer on Negative SEO. Google has launched two big "updates" to the Google algorithm of late: Panda (focusing mainly on 'keyword stuffing' and low quality content) and Penguin (focusing mainly on low quality inbound links, especially the overuse of embedded phrases). Along with this, Google seems to have increased its awareness of manual spam complaints . All of this is creating some unintended consequences. Unintended Consequences of Panda and Penguin I doubt that Google meant to increase the availability of negative SEO tactics. Negative SEO is the use of faked or aggressive tactics by your competitors to make your own site look "as if" it is doing something against Google's terms of service, or just as bad, to call Google's attention to something you are doing that many other competitors are doing as well. So think about it this way: Panda = low