Skip to main content

Revlon Love Test: What Goes Viral, and Why?

Deconstructing Love (and Viral Videos)

I woke up this morning, checked something on YouTube and saw the big, bold red banner by Revlon the LOVE TEST:

Revlon Love Test: What Goes Viral and Why?

Watch the video - it's inspirational, moving, funny, provocative, and sexy. Read the comments on YouTube: the video is clearing touching people's hearts, not surprisingly as it speaks to the greatest enigma of the human experience: love.

Here it is:

Revlon Love Test: Choose Love

Deconstructing ~

"Revlon: Love Test: Choose Love"

OK, stop crying. 

Let's be cynical marketers and deconstruct the video (which as of 6 am Pacific time / October 22, 2015 has 467,440 views - yes, it's "going viral"). What's going on here in terms of marketing? 

What are Revlon's objectives? 
And what are Revlon's methods?

#1 - Revlon wants to sell more cosmetics. The subtext of the video is that if women take a little time each day, and use Revlon cosmetics, they will not only look better, they'll feel better. They'll have better self-esteem and (subtext), they'll be more loving, more sexy, and more sexual to their partners.

  • The video has a marketing purpose: build the Revlon brand. It links up to a special Revlon "love test" page at Guess what, the key "todo" relates to using cosmetics.
#2 - The subject (LOVE), or is it SEX? It's an emotional, hot-button issue. The "masses" love to talk about love (and sex), and the enigmatic relationship between men and women... this is a subject of never-ending speculation and interest.

  • The video is about a "hot topic," and it's an "emotional" topic (and therefore encourages social sharing).
#2b - The subject (SEX) is still somewhat forbidden, so the video is somewhat "titillating," a little "taboo"

  • A "forbidden" or "taboo" topic, creating a "gosh-they-can't-be-talking-about-that" lends some "shock" value to the video (and therefore encourages social sharing). 

#3 - People. The video is shot against a stark white background, making the people stand out, and most of the people are quite good-looking.

  • People like people, and even more so, people like to look at good-looking people talking about intimate (forbidden?) topics.
#4 - Promotion. The video has a massive advertising budget behind it! It's being promoted on the FRONT PAGE of YouTube.

  • "You can't start a fire without a spark" (Bruce Springsteen). To "go viral" a video needs fuel, and that initial fuel is advertising, influencer marketing, and other behind-the-scenes efforts to get it "going."
In addition, if you visit the "Love Test" page on Revlon, it asks you to share your results on Instagram and Twitter. So - 

Spark > Fuel > Fire > Spread
Advertising > Provocative, Emotional Content > Social Shares > Spread

Enjoy the video. Ponder what you might do that would have the same viral uptake. For extra credit, ponder how you might make some viral or heavily shared content without the big budget of Revlon.

Oh, and stop being so cynical. Love someone today. Be kind to each other.

~ Jason McDonald


Popular posts from this blog

Quality Issues on Social Media Marketing Workbook?

Grrrrrrrrrr.  Amazon is reporting "quality issues" on my Social Media Marketing workbook . But, oops - there are NONE.  I've called in to complain and get them to remove that annoying "warning" but so far, nothing. Oh readers.  Those fun folks who have trouble with their Kindle and blame it on us poor and struggling authors. #OHWELL.  Always, contact me if you have issues with the books. I'll move heaven, earth, and Amazon to fix it.

Conflation: To Blend or Confuse (Perhaps with the Purpose of Misleading Someone)

There's inflation (to get bigger) and conflation (to bring together). You may have heard people say something like "she's muddying the waters," evoking the idea of someone stirring up the dirt so you can't tell where the water begins and the dirt ends. Or two rivers coming together like the mighty Rio Solimoes (the Amazon) and the Rio Negro. In arguments, conflation is used when you try to point out to your opponent (or audience) that the thinker is taking one thing and confusing it or muddling it up with another. An example might be something like: Hitler was a terrible person. He was really immoral. Hitler believed that the world was round. The world can't be round, because Hitler was immoral. Oops, you're conflating Hitler's moral character (or lack thereof), with a statement of truth or falsehood ; whether the world is flat or not. We're conflating two separate logical concepts. The world either is, or is not flat, independent of H